Hence, in promoting health and happiness of the animals, animals should not be kept in zoos. Taking animals from their rightful homes upset the ecosystem left behind. It is cruel to lock them up in a cage, instead of letting them to live their way they want in the wildlife. Which means they were injured and recovered but could no longer survive in the wild. We call this living in captivity. Dart guns, too, are on the wane, after years of causing animals a great deal of stress. They may live happily as long as they want to.
Some countries and cities now have laws to protect the animals, I think there should be laws everywhere around the world for these precious animals. This can make the animal stressed and unhappy. Mahney its sort of a win, win!! It is our responsibility as the dominant species to determine the consequences of our actions. As mentioned before, animals are living things, they also have feelings and emotions, so they have their own rights. It is imperative that these are reformed and weeded out. Would it be worth it to save their species than their happiness? For critics, zoos are seen as places for human amusement. So animals should be kept in zoos.
It also allows children to see and learn about animals that they may not otherwise get to see. They don't get to play with their mates and family. Animals are not meant to be in zoos. Wouldn't you rather have the animals live a medium to short life in the wild enjoying everything fully and naturally? It's like keeping animals in a jail cell! Indeed the very idea of reintroducing species is new, and fraught with difficulties. Therefore, zoos are the lesser evil in the wider campaign to fund animal conservation projects and ensure endangered animals do not become extinct for preventable reasons.
From camps, to mobile programs that bring smaller animals to schools, to family activities that look at local wildlife near the zoo, the public is able to get hands-on education about animals they may not be able to meet and learn about otherwise. There are many other reasons why animals should not be held to live there lives in captivity. Hear why Tim Zimmerman believes we should reconsider our arguments for keeping zoos open. Furthermore, within zoos animals have many benefits that wild animals are deprived of, from human understanding to biological study. Additionally, by engaging in breeding programs, zoos believe they protect various species from becoming extinct, therefore, making them positive institutions to exist. These are captive groups of animals that could in a worst case scenario assist in reintroduction to the wild, should the original population go extinct. This is not a fair way for these animals to live their lives.
Our fascination with wild animals is nothing new. In the first place, they should be out in their natural habitat. However, zoos should be closed down if people would like to truly know and protect animals. The animals dont need another habitat when they have their own. As long ago as 1898 the New York Zoological Society claimed to be taking 'measures to inform the public of the great decrease in animal life, to stimulate sentiment in favour of better protection and to co-operate with scientific bodies.
Do Now U aims to build civic engagement and digital literacy for learners of all ages. I recall a youtube video of one such lion named Will who after 13 years was rescued from that. Nevertheless, this is not the case as zoos only house few species of animals as compared to those an individual can observe in the wild. First, animals are also living things, they have feelings and emotions just like us humans do. Also, zoos expose animals to neglect and stress that alter their behavior hence impeding true learning for children.
This could be helpful in saving more of them. Care2 Stands With: humanitarians, animal lovers, feminists, rabble-rousers, nature-buffs, creatives, the naturally curious, and people who really love to do the right thing. And conclusions are left hanging. There is no need to worry. The easiest solution now is to set laws and fines so that zoos would stop capturing animals from the wild and then slowly, just keeping 1-3 zoos in the whole country would be much better! Zoos help with animal survival. I agree there are some good points about zoos such as the one you made.
This cannot be done by watching television. A famous wild animal is the tiger. Each animal has its life to enjoy. Animals might not being forced to do things just to entertain people. Some species, without captive breeding, would be long extinct such as Przewalski's horse which no longer exists in the wild. Some studies have shown that reintroduced animals have because they are poorly adapted and lack the skills needed to survive in the wild.
The general public should not be taught that these animals are mere jesters. Wild polar bears are forced to live in spaces that are more than a million times smaller than their arctic territory. If they are kept in zoos in order to educate society, then efforts must be put forth guarantee their comfort. Anyone can add their thoughts to this essay in a comment below. Furthermore, the animals might roam the world and it would be crazy. This is understandable because even though the park has given the elephants massive amounts of green space to themselves, in the wild they are used to hundreds and hundreds of miles that become their domain.